The future of instructional design? It’s... sort of already here. Clunky LMS interfaces and painfully long content-planning meetings are getting a facelift - from tools that don’t just speed things up, but co-create with you. And this isn’t tech-evangelist hype. It’s happening now. Quietly. Everywhere.
Articles you may like to read after this one:
🔗 What Is Otter AI? An Actually Useful Guide to the App Everyone Pretends to Know
Unpack what Otter AI really does, how it works, and why it’s more than just meeting transcription.
🔗 How to Create an AI - A Deep Dive Without the Fluff
Get to grips with building an AI from scratch, without drowning in jargon or hype.
🔗 How to Train an AI Model
A straightforward guide to dataset prep, model selection, training, and fine-tuning your own AI system.
Wait - What Is Instructional Design, Really?
Let’s not pretend everyone agrees on this. Some folks treat it like glorified PowerPoint engineering. Others see it as cognitive architecture - like, how do you build understanding from scratch? From fog to clarity? It’s part UX, part psychology, and occasionally... chaos.
And when AI steps in? That chaos gets organized. Or at least, better contained.
🛠️ Quick Comparison: AI Tools by Use Case
| Function | AI Tool Examples | What It Automates | Quirks to Know |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Course Creation | Courseau, iSpring AI | Modules, quizzes, scripts, layouts | Needs content validation |
| Adaptive Learning Delivery | Sana Labs, Docebo Learn | Learner-driven pacing + content flow | Requires solid initial input |
| AI Voice + Video | Synthesia, WellSaid Labs | Avatar narration, auto-subtitled training videos | Can feel robotic without edits |
| Quiz Builders | Quizgecko, Easygenerator | Assessment creation w/ Bloom’s logic | Needs human feedback options |
| Visual Storyboarding | Tome AI, Gamma App | Dynamic slide narratives, templates | Best for fast prototyping |
Subtle note here: don’t rely on just one tool. Stack ’em. Test ’em. They shine differently depending on your style.
Tools That Actually Help You Think
Here’s where it gets interesting. The best AI tools don’t just automate - they push your ideas into weirder, smarter places. You drop in a topic like “Empathetic Leadership,” and boom: it hands back a lesson sequence with reflective prompts, journaling hooks, and interactive segments. You’d never write that by hand in one sitting. But now? You might refine it instead.
And that’s the shift: from creator to editor. Still human. Just faster.
🎯 The Real Win? Adaptive, Dynamic Learning
Imagine your learners aren't stuck on the same linear path. They get nudged this way or that - based on how they perform. Or even how fast they’re clicking. That’s what tools like Sana and Docebo are doing.
Honestly, it’s kinda like a personalized Netflix... but for mental models.
Of course, you can’t blindly trust it. (Ever seen AI suggest teaching calculus via cat memes? It’s... something.)
Caveat Corner: Ethics, Bias, and That Gut Feeling 🤔
AI doesn’t know if your audience is neurodivergent. Or if a phrase feels exclusive. Or if a color palette might trigger sensory overload. That’s still on you.
Great instructional design means asking:
-
“Is this just efficient - or actually meaningful?”
-
“Would I enjoy this?”
-
“Am I missing a cultural nuance here?”
Because honestly? That human instinct... AI doesn’t have it. Yet.
Final Vibe Check: You’re the Designer. AI’s the Tool. 🛠️
This isn’t about replacement. It’s augmentation. Amplification. The best instructional designers aren’t the ones building from scratch - they’re the ones remixing faster, with better feedback loops.
So go ahead - get messy with it. Mix tools, bend templates, rewrite AI outputs like you’re sculpting clay. There’s no one way to do this. That’s kinda the whole point.
🧪 Side Note: When AI Totally Misses the Point (And Why That’s Weirdly Helpful)
So. One time, I asked an AI to help me build a module on conflict resolution - and it suggested a role-play involving pirates. No joke. Literal eye-patches. That was... not what I had in mind.
Thing is, moments like that aren’t just bizarre. They kinda force you to look sideways at your own thinking. Like, why did it go there? Was I unclear? Was it reaching for drama? Or is it just fundamentally clueless about nuance?
And yeah, sometimes it’s just plain wrong. Like suggesting multiple-choice questions for a lesson on grieving. Or giving everyone the same feedback regardless of performance. It happens. More than you'd expect, actually.
But weirdly? Those glitches help. They reveal blind spots. Not in the AI - but in how we feed it, shape it, assume it’ll “get” us.
What I do now - when it flubs something - I pause. I try to figure out why it landed there. I treat it like a reflective prompt, almost. Not always productive. Sometimes hilarious. Occasionally kind of... haunting?
Anyway. Save the bloopers. They’ll teach you more than the perfect outputs ever will.