If you’ve been wondering what MCP is-and why folks keep calling it the USB-C of AI apps-you’re in the right place. The short version: MCP (Model Context Protocol) is an open way for AI apps and agents to plug into external tools and data without piles of custom glue code. It standardizes how models discover tools, request actions, and pull context-so teams integrate once and reuse everywhere. Think adapters, not spaghetti. The official docs even lean into the USB-C analogy. [1]
Articles you may like to read after this one:
🔗 What is edge AI
Understand edge AI, how it works, and key real-world applications.
🔗 What is generative AI
Learn how generative AI creates content, common models, and business uses.
🔗 What is agentic AI
Discover agentic AI, autonomous agents, and how they coordinate complex tasks.
🔗 What is AI scalability
Explore AI scalability challenges, infrastructure considerations, and optimization strategies.
What is MCP in AI? The quick answer ⚡
MCP is a protocol that lets an AI app (the host) talk to a process that exposes capabilities (an MCP server) via an MCP client inside the app. Servers can offer resources, prompts, and tools. Communication runs over JSON-RPC 2.0-a simple request/response format with methods, params, results, and errors-so if you’ve used RPCs, this will feel familiar. This is how agents stop being trapped in their chat box and start doing useful work. [2]
Why people care: the N×M problem, solved-ish 🧩
Without MCP, every model-to-tool combo needs a one-off integration. With MCP, a tool implements one server that any compliant client can use. Your CRM, logs, docs, and build system stop being lonely islands. It’s not magic-UX and policy still matter-but the spec explicitly models hosts, clients, and servers to shrink the integration surface. [2]
What makes MCP useful ✅
-
Interoperability that’s boring (in a good way). Build a server once; use it across multiple AI apps. [2]
-
“USB-C for AI” mental model. Servers normalize odd APIs into a familiar shape for models. Not perfect, but it aligns teams fast. [1]
-
Discoverable tooling. Clients can list tools, validate inputs, call them with structured parameters, and get structured results (with notifications when tool lists change). [3]
-
Supported where developers live. GitHub Copilot connects MCP servers across major IDEs and adds a registry flow plus policy controls-huge for adoption. [5]
-
Transport flexibility. Use stdio for local; step up to streamable HTTP when you need a boundary. Either way: JSON-RPC 2.0 messages. [2]
How MCP actually works under the hood 🔧
At runtime you have three roles:
-
Host – the AI app that owns the user session
-
Client – the connector inside the host that speaks MCP
-
Server – a process exposing resources, prompts, and tools
They speak with JSON-RPC 2.0 messages: requests, responses, and notifications-for example, a tool-list change notification so the UI can update live. [2][3]
Transports: use stdio for robust, sandboxable local servers; move to HTTP when you need a network boundary. [2]
Server features:
-
Resources – static or dynamic data for context (files, schemas, records)
-
Prompts – reusable, parameterized instructions
-
Tools – callable functions with typed inputs and outputs
This trio is what makes MCP feel practical instead of theoretical. [3]
Where you’ll meet MCP in the wild 🌱
-
GitHub Copilot – Connect MCP servers in VS Code, JetBrains, and Visual Studio. There’s a registry and enterprise policy controls to govern use. [5]
-
Windows – OS-level support (ODR/registry) so agents can securely discover and use MCP servers with consent, logging, and admin policy. [4]
Comparison table: options for putting MCP to work today 📊
Slightly messy on purpose-because real-life tables never line up perfectly.
| Tool or setup | Who it’s for | Price-ish | Why it works with MCP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copilot + MCP servers (IDE) | Devs in editors | Copilot required | Tight IDE loop; calls MCP tools right from chat; registry + policy support. [5] |
| Windows agents + MCP | Enterprise IT & ops | Windows feature set | OS-level guardrails, consent prompts, logging, and an on-device registry. [4] |
| DIY server for internal APIs | Platform teams | Your infra | Wrap legacy systems as tools-de-silo without rewrites; typed inputs/outputs. [3] |
Security, consent, and guardrails 🛡️
MCP is the wire format and semantics; trust lives in the host and OS. Windows highlights permission prompts, registries, and policy hooks, and serious deployments treat tool invocation like running a signed binary. In short: your agent should ask before touching the sharp stuff. [4]
Pragmatic patterns that work well with the spec:
-
Keep sensitive tools local over stdio with least privilege
-
Gate remote tools with explicit scopes and approvals
-
Log every call (inputs/results) for audits
The spec’s structured methods and JSON-RPC notifications make these controls consistent across servers. [2][3]
MCP vs alternatives: which hammer for which nail? 🔨
-
Plain function calling in one LLM stack – Great when all tools live under one vendor. Not great when you want reuse across apps/agents. MCP decouples the tools from any single model vendor. [2]
-
Custom plugins per app – Works… until your fifth app. MCP centralizes that plugin into a reusable server. [2]
-
RAG-only architectures – Retrieval is powerful, but actions matter. MCP gives you structured actions plus context. [3]
A fair critique: the “USB-C” analogy can gloss over implementation differences. Protocols only help if the UX and policies are good. That nuance is healthy. [1]
Minimal mental model: request, respond, notify 🧠
Picture this:
-
Client asks server:
method: "tools/call", params: {...} -
Server replies with a result or an error
-
Server can notify clients about tool-list changes or new resources so UIs update live
This is exactly how JSON-RPC is meant to be used-and how MCP specifies tool discovery and invocation. [3]
Implementation notes that save you time ⏱️
-
Start with stdio. Easiest local path; simple to sandbox and debug. Move to HTTP when you need a boundary. [2]
-
Schema your tool inputs/outputs. Strong JSON Schema validation = predictable calls and safer retries. [3]
-
Prefer idempotent operations. Retries happen; don’t create five tickets by accident.
-
Human-in-the-loop for writes. Show diffs/approvals before destructive actions; it aligns with consent and policy guidance. [4]
Realistic use cases you can ship this week 🚢
-
Internal knowledge + actions: Wrap wiki, ticketing, and deployment scripts as MCP tools so a teammate can ask: “roll back the last deploy and link the incident.” One request, not five tabs. [3]
-
Repo operations from chat: Use Copilot with MCP servers to list repos, open PRs, and manage issues without leaving your editor. [5]
-
Desktop workflows with safety rails: On Windows, let agents read a folder or call a local CLI with consent prompts and audit trails. [4]
Frequently asked questions about MCP ❓
Is MCP a library or a standard?
It’s a protocol. Vendors ship clients and servers that implement it, but the spec is the source of truth. [2]
Can MCP replace my plugin framework?
Sometimes. If your plugins are “call this method with these args, get a structured result,” MCP can unify them. Deep app lifecycle hooks may still need bespoke plugins. [3]
Does MCP support streaming?
Yes-transport options include streamable HTTP, and you can send incremental updates via notifications. [2]
Is JSON-RPC hard to learn?
Nope. It’s basic method+params+id in JSON, which many libraries already support-and MCP shows exactly how it’s used. [2]
A tiny protocol detail that pays off 📎
Every call has a method name and typed params. That structure makes it easy to attach scopes, approvals, and audit trails-much harder with free-form prompts. Windows’ docs show how to wire these checks into the OS experience. [4]
Quick architecture sketch you can scribble on a napkin 📝
Host app with chat → contains an MCP client → opens a transport to one or more servers → servers expose capabilities → model plans a step, calls a tool, receives a structured result → chat shows diffs/previews → user approves → next step. Not magic-just plumbing that stays out of the way. [2]
Final Remarks – the Too Long, I Didn't Read It 🎯
MCP turns a chaotic tool ecosystem into something you can reason about. It won’t write your security policy or UI, but it gives you a boring, predictable backbone for actions + context. Start where adoption is smooth-Copilot in your IDE or Windows agents with consent prompts-then wrap internal systems as servers so your agents can do real work without a labyrinth of custom adapters. That’s how standards win. [5][4]
References
-
MCP overview & “USB-C” analogy – Model Context Protocol: What is MCP?
-
Authoritative spec (roles, JSON-RPC, transports, security) – Model Context Protocol Specification (2025-06-18)
-
Tools, schemas, discovery & notifications – MCP Server Features: Tools
-
Windows integration (ODR/registry, consent, logging, policy) – Model Context Protocol (MCP) on Windows – Overview
-
IDE adoption & management – Extending GitHub Copilot Chat with MCP servers