AI News 13th January 2026

AI News Wrap-Up: 13th January 2026

🎙️ Deepgram lands $130M, hits $1.3B valuation as voice agents heat up

Deepgram just pulled in a fresh $130 million round, nudging it into unicorn-ish territory - which reads like the market loudly saying, “yes, we do want machines to talk back.” The pitch stays refreshingly clean: speech-to-text and voice AI infrastructure that companies can plug into their own products.

The money’s aimed at scaling internationally, expanding language support, and generally bulking up compute. They’ve also been buying adjacent pieces (including drive-thru-ish voice tech) because ordering fries through an AI is now a normal business plan.

🧠 AI chip startup Etched raises about $500M to take on Nvidia

Etched reportedly raised around $500 million in a round that basically screams, “the AI chip land-grab isn’t done.” The ambition is enormous - build hardware that can compete in a world where Nvidia has been the default answer for almost everything.

What’s interesting is the tone shift: more startups are picking the “specialized silicon” route rather than renting GPUs forever. It’s like trying to out-bake the bakery by inventing a new oven… slightly unhinged, but sometimes that’s how it works.

🧩 US approves Nvidia H200 chip exports to China with conditions

The US moved to allow exports of advanced AI chips (including Nvidia’s H200) to China, but with conditions - so it’s not exactly “open season,” more like “open season, supervised.” It’s a notable policy wobble on one of the most sensitive levers in the broader tech rivalry.

Depending on how those conditions get enforced, this could reshape who gets cutting-edge training capacity and how quickly. The details matter here - it can look permissive on paper while staying tight in practice… or so it seems.

China reportedly limits Nvidia chip purchases to special circumstances

On the China side, there’s reporting that Nvidia chip purchases may be restricted to “special circumstances,” which is one of those phrases that can mean almost anything - and that’s part of the design. It signals tighter control over who can buy what, and why.

If you’re running an AI team, this changes the planning math: procurement becomes policy-shaped, not just budget-shaped. The supply chain starts acting like a maze that rearranges itself while you’re inside it.

💬 Meta says it won’t remove third-party AI chatbots from WhatsApp in Italy

Meta’s WhatsApp approach to third-party AI chatbots got a carve-out for Italy after an interim order from the Italian competition authority. So the “no AI companies if your main thing is AI” stance - yes, that was real - is now picking up country-specific exceptions.

It’s a reminder that distribution rules are becoming as important as model quality. You can have the slickest chatbot on earth, but if the pipes get turned off (or half-turned off), you’re basically yelling into a pillow.

🧰 Flip raises $20M Series A for vertical AI customer service

Flip snagged a $20 million Series A by leaning into a very specific idea: “generic AI support agent” isn’t enough - you want customer service AI tuned to a particular industry and workflow. Vertical beats horizontal, at least when buyers are picky (and they are).

The bet is that domain constraints make the product feel safer, more predictable, less likely to go full improv-comedian in front of customers. Not as flashy as frontier models, but probably where a lot of money quietly gets made.

🏛️ EU consultation on AI regulatory sandboxes hits its feedback deadline

The EU’s push to formalize “AI regulatory sandboxes” - controlled environments to test AI under regulatory supervision - reached the end of its public feedback window. This is the plumbing work of AI governance: not glamorous, but it decides how innovation actually gets trialed.

If these sandboxes are designed well, they can reduce the weird limbo where companies don’t know what compliance looks like until it’s too late. If they’re designed badly… congrats, you’ve invented bureaucracy with extra steps.

FAQ

What does Deepgram’s $130M raise mean for companies building voice AI?

Deepgram’s $130M round and $1.3B valuation points to sustained demand for plug-in speech-to-text and voice AI infrastructure. The company says it will use the funding to scale internationally, expand language support, and increase compute. It has also been acquiring adjacent tech, including drive-thru-style voice capabilities. For builders, this typically translates into broader language coverage, more capacity, and a wider product surface area from a core vendor.

Why are startups like Etched raising huge rounds to compete with Nvidia?

Etched reportedly raised around $500M because the “rent GPUs forever” approach can become expensive and supply-constrained at scale. Specialized silicon is a wager that purpose-built hardware can deliver better performance or efficiency for specific workloads. It’s a high-risk path since Nvidia remains the default baseline, but the funding suggests investors still see room for new chip architectures. Many teams will be watching for credible benchmarks and practical availability.

What do the shifting US - China Nvidia chip rules mean for AI teams?

The U.S. reportedly moved to allow exports of advanced AI chips, including Nvidia’s H200, to China under conditions, while reporting also suggests China may restrict Nvidia purchases to “special circumstances.” Together, that makes procurement policy-shaped, not just budget-shaped. In practice, planning often shifts toward contingency options: alternate suppliers, diversified regions, or capacity reserved earlier. The exact enforcement details can matter as much as the headline.

What’s going on with third-party AI chatbots on WhatsApp in Italy?

Meta’s stance on restricting third-party AI chatbots on WhatsApp appears to be getting country-specific exceptions, with Italy mentioned after an interim order from the Italian competition authority. The takeaway is that distribution rules can shift quickly and differ by market. If you’re deploying a chatbot through major platforms, you typically need a compliance and partnership plan per region. Product quality alone won’t guarantee access to the “pipes.”

Why are investors backing vertical AI customer service tools like Flip?

Flip’s $20M Series A reflects a bet that “generic AI support agent” isn’t enough for many buyers. Vertical tools concentrate on a specific industry’s workflows, constraints, and terminology, which can make behavior more predictable and easier to trust. In many customer service setups, tighter domain boundaries reduce unwanted improvisation and simplify rollout. The value is often in integration and reliability, not just model capability.

What are EU AI regulatory sandboxes, and why do they matter?

EU “AI regulatory sandboxes” are meant to be supervised environments where companies can test AI systems while engaging with regulators. The EU consultation on how to establish these sandboxes has reached its feedback deadline, which is a step toward formalizing the framework. If designed well, sandboxes can reduce uncertainty about what compliance looks like before launch. Teams often use them to validate controls, documentation, and monitoring early.

Yesterday's AI News: 12th January 2026

Find the Latest AI at the Official AI Assistant Store

About Us

Back to blog